Your buyers already ask AI for vendors, plans, and trade-offs. We help you define the neutral prompts that mirror those journeys, run them on a schedule, and report whether each surface mentions you fairly — with receipts your leadership can align on.
01 — Prompt Runs
🔍
Run fixed buyer-intent prompts
Define neutral prompts and topics that mirror real buyer journeys. Run them across target models on a fixed schedule — no more one-off screenshots in notebooks.
02 — Compare Answers
📊
Measure mention quality across models
Compare mention quality, competitor presence, and domain citations side by side. Omissions, hallucinations, and citation gaps surface clearly per model.
03 — Ship Recommendations
🚀
Turn findings into prioritized tasks
Recommendations become a shared backlog: what to change first, who owns it, and what to re-measure. GEO audits show exactly where to tighten flagship URLs and structured data.
Illustrative metrics from how teams run GEO on theaivis: site readiness trending up, buyer-list presence across prompts, consistent brand attribution next to peers.
Sample data, not a live account.
GEO Audit Score
Composite readiness
+0pts
Composite readiness from scored audit modules, trending after fixes ship. Tighter flagship URLs, structured data, and proof points that stop models guessing from noisy sources.
Progress24 pts gained
Shortlist Presence
Unbranded queries
0%
Mean share of unbranded "top brands" lists where you appear, tracked over time. When competitors are named and you're missing — that's exactly the gap GEO closes.
Presence rate6.8% mean share
Brand Attribution
Model confidence
0/100
Model-reported confidence that your focus brand is attributed clearly — fewer hallucinated claims, and citations worth defending in a sales cycle.
Attribution score68 / 100
Peer Comparison
vs competitors
0/100
Peer list scores: your brand's confidence next to named competitors. Cross-model storytelling so your brand carries through into generated answers consistently.
We chose the name theaivis to fuse conversational AI—the “AI”—with vis, the same root as visibility. We built a marketing and GEO platform so teams can run programs—not one-off chats—that make brands easier for assistants to find, describe fairly, and cite with confidence.
GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) is improving how AI systems discover, summarize, and quote your brand in conversational answers. It complements classic SEO with an answer-layer goal: factual alignment, consistent naming, and passages models can reuse without inventing details.
GEO audits score site and content readiness; the audit view contrasts how enabled models talk about your brand; visibility prompts (by topic) mirror buyer questions. When you rerun on a schedule, you’re comparing like with like instead of one-off prompts in a notebook.
ChatGPT (OpenAI), Claude (Anthropic), Gemini (Google), and Perplexity are supported out of the box. Outputs are grouped by model so you can compare tone, omissions, and citation habits side by side.
Teams that ship focused fixes — schema alignment, clearer flagship pages, refreshed FAQs — often see directional shifts within a few measurement cycles. Model updates vary by vendor, so theaivis emphasizes dated reruns rather than promising a fixed timeline.
No. theaivis complements SEO systems by focusing on generated-answer visibility and cross-model comparability — the layer buyers see in assistants before they click through to your site.
Most teams run daily during active optimization and weekly or monthly for baseline monitoring. Schedules keep prompts and audits comparable so leadership reviews trends, not one-off screenshots.
No. theaivis runs every model query on our own provider access — you never connect, share, or pay for OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Perplexity keys. You pick the models and prompts; we handle all AI access behind the scenes and group outputs by model so you can compare them in one place.
Yes. After each GEO audit and visibility run, theaivis turns the findings into prioritized, de-duplicated recommendations — crawler access, llms.txt, entity and Wikipedia presence, and which sources to get cited on for specific buyer questions — so fixes and measurement stay on one thread instead of a static report.
Yes — within your plan’s brand limits you can run GEO audits and visibility prompts per brand. Target locations and topics help teams mirror how PMMs talk about buyers and markets.
Ad-hoc prompts are hard to defend in reviews. theaivis saves neutral prompts by topic, reruns on a schedule, and ties results to audit recommendations so fixes and measurements stay on the same thread.